Preparing quality teachers: Bridging the gap between tertiary experiences and classroom realities

Corinne Green, Michelle Eady, Peter Andersen


There are many factors that impact student learning, with quality educators being one of the most important elements for student success. Accordingly, the promotion of quality teacher preparation programs has become a priority for tertiary institutions, researchers, policymakers and practitioners. There is a known disparity between tertiary experiences and the classroom reality that leaves graduate teachers feeling unprepared for the teaching profession. Employing a contextualized learning approach such as situated learning theory in teacher preparation programs can reduce this gap and successfully prepare graduate teachers for the teaching arena. This research project surveyed one cohort (n=154) at the conclusion of a four-year initial teacher education program, and again six months after graduation, as well as analyzed the subject outlines of the core final year subjects. The study found that the final year of the program incorporated the key tenets of situated learning theory, integrated theory and practice, and prepared the graduates for the realities of the teaching profession by effectively contextualizing their tertiary learning. 


teacher education; pre-service teachers; quality teaching; situated learning; tertiary experiences

Full Text:



Adoniou, M. (2013). Preparing teachers: The importance of connecting contexts in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(8), 47-60,

Australian Government Department of Education. (2014). Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group Issues Paper. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education.

Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.

Barret Kutcy, C. E., & Schulz, R. (2006). Why are beginning teachers frustrated with the teaching profession? McGill Journal of Education, 41(1), 77–90,

Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers' professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers (pp. 25–48). New York, NY: Springer.

Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (2013). Professional competence of teachers, cognitively activating instruction, and the development of students' mathematical literacy (COACTIV): A research program. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Springer.

Beck, C., Kosnik, C., & Rowsell, J. (2007). Preparation for the first year of teaching: Beginning teachers' views about their needs. New Educator, 3(1), 51–73,

Bell, R. L., Maeng, J. L., & Binns, I. C. (2013). Learning in context: Technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 348–379,

Bergman, M. M. (2010). Hermeneutic content analysis: Textual and audiovisual analyses within a mixed methods framework. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed., pp. 379–396). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2007). Who Leaves? Teacher Attrition and Student Achievement. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Churchill, R., Ferguson, P., Godinho, S., Johnson, N. F., Keddie, A., Letts, W., Mackay, J., McGill, M., Moss, J., Nagel, M. C., Nicholson, P., & Vick, M. (2011). Teaching: Making a Difference. Milton, QLD: John Wiley & Sons Australia.

Clift, R. T., & Brady, P. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying Teacher Education: The Report of the AERA Panel of Research and Teacher Education (pp. 309–424). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Cochran-Smith, M., McQuillan, P., Mitchell, K., Gahlsdorf Terrell, D., Barnatt, J., D'Souza, L., Jong, C., Shakman, K., Lam, K., & Gleeson, A. M. (2012). A longitudinal study of teaching practice and early career decisions: A cautionary tale. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 844–880,

Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying Teacher Education: The Report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Cookson, P. W. (2005). Your first year: Why teach? Teaching Pre K-8, 36(3), 14–21,

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Croydon, UK: SAGE.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006a). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 120–138,

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006b). Powerful Teacher Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

DeAngelis, K. J., & Presley, J. B. (2011). Toward a more nuanced understanding of new teacher attrition. Education and Urban Society, 43(5), 598–628,

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, Mail and Mixed-mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Durn, J. L. (2010). No Teacher Left Behind: Effectiveness of New Teacher Groups to Facilitate Induction (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (

Gigliotti, A.-R. (2012). Quality teaching and learning in the educational context : Teacher pedagogy to support learners of a modern digital society. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 2(1), 78–84,

Gillham, B. (2010). Case Study Research Methods. London: Continuum International Publishing.

Goldhaber, D. D., Gross, B., & Player, D. (2007). Are Public Schools Really Losing Their Best? Assessing the Career Transitions of Teachers and Their Implications for the Quality of the Teacher Workforce. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

Helfrich, S., & Bean, R. (2011). Beginning teachers reflect on their experiences being prepared to teach literacy. Teacher Education and Practice, 24(2), 201–222,

Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48,

Hinde-McLeod, J. H., & Reynolds, R. (2007). Quality Teaching for Quality Learning: Planning Through Reflection. South Melbourne, VIC: Cengage Learning Australia.

Kleickmann, T., & Anders, Y. (2013). Learning at university. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers (pp. 321–332). New York, NY: Springer.

Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2013). The COACTIV research program on teachers' professional competence: Summary and discussion. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers (pp. 345–368). New York, NY: Springer.

Ladwig, J. G. (2009). Working backwards towards curriculum: On the curricular implications of quality teaching. The Curriculum Journal, 20(3), 271–286,

Ladwig, J. G., Smith, M., Gore, J., Amosa, W., & Griffiths, T. (2007). Quality of Pedagogy and Student Achievement: Multi-level Replication of Authentic Pedagogy. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) 2007 International Education Research Conference, Fremantle, WA,

Le Maistre, C., & Paré, A. (2010). Whatever it takes: How beginning teachers learn to survive. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 559–564,

Liberante, L. (2012). The importance of teacher-student relationships, as explored through the lens of the NSW Quality Teaching Model. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 2(1), 2–9,

Lieber, E., & Weisner, T. S. (2010). Meeting the practical challenges of mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed., pp. 559–580). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Livingstone, D., Guild, D., & Clark, R. (2012). Teacher Learning and Power in the Knowledge Society. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Luft, J. A., Roehrig, G. H., & Patterson, N. C. (2003). Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning science teachers' practices, beliefs, and experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 77–97,

Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Price, A., & McConney, A. (2012). 'Don't sweat the small stuff': Understanding teacher resilience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 357–367,

Mansfield, C. F., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Impact of structured group activities on pre-service teachers’ beliefs about classroom motivation: An exploratory study. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(2), 155–172,

Mantei, J., & Tindall-Ford, S. (2012). Faculty of Education Review: Primary Education Undergraduate Program. Wollongong, NSW: University of Wollongong.

McConney, A., Price, A., & Woods-McConney, A. (2012). Fast Track Teacher Education: A Review of the Research Literature on Teach For All Schemes. Perth, WA: Murdoch University Centre for Learning, Change and Development.

Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 2214–2226). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

Nahal, S. P. (2010). Voices from the field: Perspectives of first-year teachers on the disconnect between teacher preparation programs and the realities of the classroom. Research in Higher Education Journal, 8, 1–19,

NSW Department of Education and Communities. (2013). Great Teaching, Inspired Learning. Sydney: New South Wales Department of Education and Communities.

NSW Department of Education and Training. (2003). Quality Teaching in NSW Public Schools. Sydney: Professional Support and Curriculum Directorate, New South Wales Department of Education and Training.

NSW Department of Education and Training. (2008). Quality Teaching to Support the NSW Professional Teaching Standards: Part A—Linking the NSW Professional Teaching Standards and the NSW Quality Teaching Model. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training Professional Learning and Leadership Development Directorate.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Combs, J. P. (2010). Emergent data analysis techniques in mixed methods research: A synthesis. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed., pp. 397–430). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Orgill, M. (2007). Situated cognition. In G. M. Bodner & M. Orgill (Eds.), Theoretical Frameworks for Research in Chemistry/Science Education (pp. 187–203). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Owen-Pugh, V. (2002). The elite British basketball club as a 'community of practice': A critique of Lave and Wenger's model of situated learning. Management Research News, 25(8-10), 147–149,

Quacquarelli Symonds. (2016). QS world university rankings® 2016/17. Retrieved from

Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching. (2015). Teacher education results 2015. Retrieved from

Ritchart, R. (2001). From IQ to IC: A dispositional view of intelligence. Roeper Review, 23(3), 571–576,

Riveros, A., Newton, P., & Burgess, D. (2012). A situated account of teacher agency and learning: Critical reflections on professional learning communities. Canadian Journal of Education, 35(1), 202–216,

Rots, I., Aelterman, A., Devos, G., & Vlerick, P. (2010). Teacher education and the choice to enter the teaching profession: A prospective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1619–1629,

Rots, I., Kelchtermans, G., & Aelterman, A. (2012). Learning (not) to become a teacher: A qualitative analysis of the job entrance issue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 1–10,

Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109,

Savasci, F., & Berlin, D. F. (2012). Science teacher beliefs and classroom practice related to constructivism in different school settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 65–86,

Schell, J. W., & Black, R. S. (1997). Situated learning: An inductive case study of a collaborative learning experience. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 34(4), 5–28,

Shuls, J. V., & Ritter, G. W. (2013). Teacher preparation: Not an either–or. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(7), 28–32,

Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2011). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1337–1370,

Soccorsi, L. (2013). Instilling a personal teaching philosophy in pre-service teachers: Vitally important but not always easy to achieve. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 3(1), 21–28,

Tatto, M. T. (2006). Education reform and the global regulation of teachers' education, development and work: A cross-cultural analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(4-5), 231–241,

Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2008). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. In V. L. Plano Clark & J. W. Creswell (Eds.), The Mixed Methods Reader (pp. 199–228). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Trees, K. (2013). Effectively teaching diverse student groups: A reflection on teaching and learning strategies. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 53(2), 234–252,

Vannatta, R., Beyerbach, B., & Walsh, C. (2001). From teaching technology to using technology to enhance student learning: Preservice teachers' changing perceptions of technology infusion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 105–127,

Volet, S. E., & Mansfield, C. F. (2006). Group work at university: Significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals. Higher Education Research & Development Journal, 25(4), 341–356,

Wiens, P. D., Hessberg, K., LoCasale-Crouch, J., & DeCoster, J. (2013). Using a standardized video-based assessment in a university teacher education program to examine preservice teachers knowledge related to effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 33, 24–33,

Woodcock, S., & Reupert, A. (2013). Does training matter? Comparing the behaviour management strategies of pre-service teachers in a four-year program and those in a one-year program. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 84–98,


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Teaching & Learning Inquiry is the official journal of the
International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL)