Flipped learning, flipped satisfaction, getting the balance right

Rosemary Fisher, Bella Ross, Richard LaFerriere, Alex Maritz

Abstract


This paper explores students’ perceptions of their learning outcomes, engagement, and satisfaction with a technology-facilitated flipped approach in a third-year core subject at an Australian university during 2014. In this pilot study, findings reveal that students preferred the flipped approach to the traditional face-to-face delivery and reported increased engagement, satisfaction, and learning outcomes as a result of both the flipped classroom approach and the use of digital technologies in the delivery of the unit. However, students did report frustration and less satisfaction generally with the flipped model in the initial stages of the semester. The implications are that students may require extra support in the initial stages of delivery of a flipped class to assist them to understand and take up the challenge of the
approach, thereby maximising student engagement and satisfaction earlier in the semester.


Keywords


flipped learning; perceptions; learning outcomes; engagement; satisfaction; blended learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34, 1-14.

Arnold-Garza, S. (2014). The Flipped Classroom. College & Research Libraries News, 75, 10-13.

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Hitting the books: Characteristics of higher education students. In Australian Social Trends, July 2014 (Vol. 2015). Canberra, AU: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236.

Baron, P., & Corbin, L. (2012). Student engagement: Rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 31, 759–772.

Bazeley, P. (2012). Integrative analysis strategies for mixed data sources. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 814-828.

Bedggood, R., & Donovan, J. (2012). University performance evaluations: What are we really measuring? Studies in Higher Education, 37, 825-842.

Bolliger, D. U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, January-March, 61-67.

Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2014). The calibration of student judgement through self-assessment: Disruptive effects of assessment patterns. Higher Education Research & Development, 34, 45-59.

Brooks, A. W. (2014). Information literacy and the flipped classroom: Examining the impact of a one-shot flipped class on student learning and perceptions. Communications in Information Literacy, 8, 225-235.

Canadian Federation of Students. (2013). Student employment: Eroding academic success. In Fact Sheets and Advisories (Fall 2013 ed., Vol. 2015). Ottawa, ON: Canadian Feederation of Students.

Carbone, A., Ross, B., Phelan, L., Lindsay, K., Drew, S., Stoney, S., & Cottman, C. (2014). Course evaluation matters: Improving students’ learning experiences with a peer-assisted teaching programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 165-180.

Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16-27.

Christensen, C. M. (2002). The opportunity & threat of disruptive technologies. In Faculty Seminar Series (Version 2.1 ed., Vol. Product Number 1482C). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Publishing.

Citi, & Seventeen. (2013). New Citi/Seventeen survey: College students take control of their financial futures. Retrieved from http://www.citigroup.com/citi/news/2013/130807a.htm.

Colvin Clark, R. (2015). Evidence-based training methods: A guide for training professionals. In: Books24x7.

Davies, R., Dean, D., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and

Development, 61, 563-580.

Douglas, J. A., Douglas, A., McClelland, R. J., & Davies, J. (2014). Understanding student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: An interpretive study in the UK higher education context. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 329-349.

Douglass, J. A., Thomson, G., & Zhao, C. M. (2012). The learning outcomes race: The value of self-reported gains in large research universities. Higher Education, 64, 317-335.

Endsleigh Insurance Services Limited. (2015). 77% of students now work to fund studies. Retrieved from https://www.endsleigh.co.uk/.

Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57, 14-27.

Findlay-Thompson, S., & Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education & Accreditation, 6, 63-71.

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.

Gauci, S. A., Dantas, A. M., Williams, D. A., & Kemm, R. E. (2009). Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. Advances in Physiology Education, 33, 60-71.

Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2015). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567-1569.

Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching,42, 62.

Higgitt, D. (2014). Disruptive moments. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38, 1-6.

Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to forster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28. pp 81-96.

Johnson, G. B. (2007). Student perceptions of the flipped classroom. (Unpublished Masters Thesis). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.

Kahu, E. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758-773.

Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328.

Kristjanson, L. (2013). Leading change: How Swinburne is creating its own future. In Tertiary Education Management Conference 2013. Melbourne, Australia: Swinburne University of Technology.

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134.

Lord, S. M., Prince, M. J., Stefanou, C. R., Stolk, J. D., & Chen, J. C. (2012). The effect of different active learning environments on student outcomes related to lifelong learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 606.

Mason, G., Shuman, T., & Cook, K. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56, 430-435.

Michaelson, L. (2008). First-day questions for the learner-centred classroom. The National Teaching & Learning Forum, 17, 1-2.

Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52, 597-599.

O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95.

Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievment in a unverisity blended learningstrategic initiative. Internet and Higher Education. pp 38-46.

Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76.

Praslova, L. (2010). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in higher education. Education Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 22, 215-225.

Prober, C., & Khan, S. (2013). Medical education reimagined: A call to action. Academic Medicine, 88, 1407-1410.

Ruddick, K. W. (2012). Improving chemical education from high school to college using a more hands-on approach. (Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation). University of Memphis, Ann Arbor, MI.

Salamonson, Y., Andrew, S., & Everett, B. (2009). Academic engagement and disengagement as predictors of performance in pathophysiology among nursing students. Contemporary Nurse, 32, 123-132.

Salmon, G., & Angood, R. (2013). Sleeping with the enemy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 916-925.

Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24-31.

Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmussen, S. C., & Wageman, J. (2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1334-1339.

Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15, 171-193.

Te Riele, K. (2014). Putting the jigsaw together: Flexible learning programs in Australia. Final report. Melbourne, AU: The Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong Learning.

Tham, C. M., & Werner, J. M. (2005). Designing and evaluation e-learning in higher education: A review and recommendations. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11, 15-25.

Thaman, R. G., Dhillon, S. K., Saggar, S., Gupta, M. P., & Kaur, H. (2013). Promoting active learning in respiratory physiology-positive student perception and improved outcomes. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 3, 27-34.

Trowler, V., & Trowler, P. (2010). Student engagement evidence summary. In The Higher Education Academy Student Engagement Project: University of Lancaster.

Wiesenberg, F. (2013). The roller coaster life of the online learner: How distance educators can help students cope. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 27. pp 33-59.

Wilson, S. (2014). The flipped class: A method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 40, 193-199.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11, 167-177.

Zhu, E., Kaplan, M., Dershimer, R. C., & Bergom, I. (2011). Use of laptops in the classroom: Research and best practice. CRLT Occasional Papers Vol 30. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan. pp 1-6.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.9

PID: http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5tt4g99



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


CURRENTPREVIOUSSUBMISSIONSALERTSLOGINABOUT

Teaching & Learning Inquiry is the official journal of the
International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL)