Changes in approaches to learning over three years of university undergraduate study

Fiona McDonald, John Reynolds, Ann Bixley, Rachel Spronken-Smith

Abstract


This study aimed to evaluate and compare approaches to learning by a longitudinal cohort of undergraduate students as they progressed from their first to third years of study in anatomy and physiology. The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) was
completed at the beginning and end of their first year of university study, and in their final semester. At first year, a surface learning approach predominated; however, at third year, students showed a significant increase in their use of deep and strategic learning approaches compared to first year, although surface learning approaches were retained. The extent to which third-year students took both strategic and deep approaches to learning was positively correlated with their performance on assessment. As students progress through a three-year science degree, they develop deeper and more strategic learning approaches, and assessment and teaching styles probably promote these approaches to learning.


Keywords


learning inventory; ASSIST; physiology; anatomy; longitudinal study

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5, 243-260.

Biggs, J. (1987). The study process questionnaire manual: Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, AU: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at University. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y.L. (2001). The revised two-factor study process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 133-149.

Bolhuis, S. (2003). Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 13, 327-347.

Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2002). The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: a study of Irish accounting students. Accounting Education, 11, 27-42.

Dinsmore, D.L., Alexander, P.A., & Loughlin, S.M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391-409.

Dinsmore, D.L., & Alexander, P.A. (2012). A critical discussion of deep and surface processing: What it means, how it is measured, the role of context, and model specification. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 499-567.

Diseth, A., & Martinsen, O. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195-207.

Diseth, A., Pallesen, S., Hovland, A., & Larsen, S. (2006). Course experience, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Education & Training, 48(2/3), 156–169

Diseth, A. (2007). Students' evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(2), 185-204.

Donche, V., Coertjens, L., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). Learning pattern development throughout higher education: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 256-259.

Entwistle, N., Hanley, M., & Hounsell, D. (1979). Identifying distinctive approaches to studying. Higher Education, 8, 365-380.

Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London, UK: Croom Helm.

Entwistle, N. (1997). Reconstituting approaches to learning: A response to Webb. Higher Education, 33, 213-218.

Entwistle, N. (2000). Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: Conceptual frameworks and educational contexts. Paper presented at The First Annual Conference Of The Teaching And Learning Research Programme. Leicester, UK. Abstract retrieved from http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/publications.html.

Entwistle, N., Tait, H., McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 33-48.

Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories.Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325-345.

Entwistle, N. J., & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behavior and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 407–428.

Ertl, H., & Wright, S. (2008). Reviewing the literature on the student learning experience in higher education. London Review of Education, 6(3), 195-210.

Gibbs, G. R. (1999). Learning how to learn using a virtual learning environment for philosophy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 221-231.

Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 87-100.

Gordon, C., & Debus, R. (2002). Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 483–511.

Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1990). Does higher education promote independent learning? Higher Education, 19, 307-

Greasley, A., & Bennet, D. (2004). A virtual learning environment for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(10), 974-993.

Kane, R., Sandretto, S., Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 177–228.

Kember, D., & Kwan, K-P. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469–490.

Lucas, U. (2001). Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: a phenomenographic study. Accounting Education, 10(2), 161–184.

Maguire, S., Evans, S. E., & Dyas, L. (2001). Approaches to learning: A study of first-year geography undergraduates. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 25(1), 95-107.

Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.

Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Tse, L. K. (1993). The Paradox of the Chinese Learner. Melbourne, Australia: Educational Research and Development Unit, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology.

Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (2nd ed., pp. 39–58). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., Bjork. R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 106-119.

Pintrich, P.R. (1991). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407.

Postareff, L., Lindblom-Yla¨nne, S., Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 557–571.

Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

QS World University Rankings (2018). QS world university rankings. Retrieved from: http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed). London, UK: Routledge.

Reid, W. A., Duvall, E., & Evans, P. (2007). Relationship between assessment results and approaches to learning and studying in year two medical students. Medical Education, 41, 754-762.

Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93-111.

Schmeck, R. R., Ribich, F., & Ramanaiah, N. (1977). Development of a self-report inventory for assessing individual differences in learning processes. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 413-431.

Schmeck, R. R., Geisler-Brenstein, E., & Cercy, S.P. (1991). Self-concept and learning: the revised inventory of learning processes. Educational Psychology, 11, 343-362.

Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, 453-452.

Speth, C. A., Lee, D. J., & Hain, P. M. (2006). Prioritizing improvements in internet instruction based on learning styles and strategies. Journal of Natural Resources & Life Sciences Education, 35, 34-41.

Spronken-Smith, R.A., Buissink-Smith, N., Bond, C. & Grigg, G. (2015). Graduates’ orientations to higher education and their retrospective experiences of teaching and learning. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 3, 55-70.

Tait, H., Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning. Improving students as learners (pp. 262-271).

Oxford, UK: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development. Survey tool retrieved from:

http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/questionnaires/ASSIST.pdf

Thomas, P. R., & Bain, J. D. (1984). Contextual dependence of learning approaches: The effects of assessments. Human Learning, 3, 227-240.

Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70.

University of Otago (2013). University of Otago Teaching and Learning Plan (2013-20). Retrieved from

http://www.otago.ac.nz/staff/otago027123.pdf.

Vermetten, Y. J., Vermunt, J. D., & Lodewijks, H. G. (1999). A longitudinal perspective on learning strategies in higher education – Different view-points towards development. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 221-242.

Vermut, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31, 25-50.

Walker, R., Spronken-Smith, R., Bond, C., McDonald, F., Reynolds, J., & Martin, A. (2010). The impact of curriculum change on health science first year students’ approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 38(6), 707-722.

Watkins, D. & Hattie, J. (1985). A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students. Human Learning, 4, 127-141.

Webster, R. (2002). Learning styles and design: The use of ASSIST for reflection and assessment. Proceedings of the 2002 Annual International Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA), Perth, Australia. http://www.herdsa.org.au/index.php?page_id=175.

Weinstein, C. E. (1982). Training students to use elaboration learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7, 301–311.

Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students’ approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 87-101.

Zeegers, P. (2001). Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 115-132.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.6

PID: http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5707x57



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


CURRENTPREVIOUSSUBMISSIONSALERTSLOGINABOUT

Teaching & Learning Inquiry is the official journal of the
International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL)